Kathy
M. Kristof:
Personal Finance
Charitable Donations
Get Stricter Tax Rules
Soon you'll need a receipt or canceled check for every
gift. And those old jeans must be in 'good' shape.
August 27, 2006
The
nation's new pension law may have an unexpected effect
on your ability to deduct charitable contributions.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006, passed this month,
was aimed at shoring up the beleaguered defined-benefit
pension system. But it includes a variety of unrelated
provisions, including some that govern the type of
proof that will now be required to claim tax breaks
for gifts to charities, including cash and clothing
given to organizations such as Goodwill and the Salvation
Army.
The
bottom line: Where the government once was willing
to trust that you weren't padding the deducted value
of small gifts, now you're going to need proof that
you gave something — and something of real value —
if you want to deduct it.
"I don't know if the Salvation Army kettle people
are going to start giving receipts, but that's essentially
what would be required if you wanted to claim the
dollar you contributed as a deduction," said
Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst with CCH Inc., a Riverwoods, Ill.-based publisher of tax information.
Under current law, taxpayers are largely taken at
their word when claiming $20 placed in the church
collection plate, or the relatively minor amounts
of out-of-pocket cash that they might throw into the
Salvation Army's annual Christmas kettles.
Documentation has been required only for a donation
of $250 or more. But, if audited, taxpayers are expected
to supply a written record of how much they gave and
to whom.
The new law, however, requires that taxpayers have
a receipt or canceled check for every monetary donation.
A taxpayer's written record is no longer enough.
"This is going to have a really big impact,"
said John Hewitt, founder of Liberty Tax Service in
Virginia Beach, Va. "I know I give hundreds of
dollars in small cash donations every year. Now, you
won't be able to do that without getting a receipt."
Receipts or canceled checks do not have to be provided
with a tax return, but can be demanded if the taxpayer
is audited. If the taxpayer doesn't have the desired
proof, deductions can be disallowed.
The bright side: For calendar-year taxpayers — that's
most of us — the provision doesn't take effect until
next year.
Rules on donations of old clothing and household items
also were tightened up by the law, Luscombe
said.
Deductions now can be taken only if the donated items
are in "good" condition or better. Exactly
what that means is a mystery; the law does not define
good condition.
Computer programs that help taxpayers value deductions
will still be allowed, he added. But they may need
to be revised, said Bob Meighan,
vice president of Intuit Inc.'s Turbo Tax software
division. That's because their programs have allowed
for gifts of "excellent," "good"
or "fair" quality.
Under the new rules for noncash
donations, which went into effect when the law was
signed Aug. 17, a donated item can be deducted in
"fair" condition only if it's worth $500
or more, and the taxpayer gets an appraisal to prove
it.
Hewitt speculates that some charities will add a box
to their receipts for noncash contributions to note their condition. Until that
happens, it's up to the taxpayer to establish their
value, so those who give away a lot of clothing and
housewares may want to include
more detail in their records, Luscombe
added.
"In the past, it probably would be fine if you
just said you'd given 10 dresses and five pairs of
slacks," Luscombe said.
"Maybe now you have to say a little more — and
possibly get the charity to sign off on your assessment
of condition."
Luscombe speculates that
legislators made these changes because they thought
the tax system was suffering "a death of a thousand
cuts." Americans donate $9 billion a year in
clothing and used household items.
"I think there was a concern that maybe everybody
was fudging by just a few bucks," he said. "If
that happens millions of times, the dollars really
start to add up."
(Rules governing donations of automobiles, another
area in which legislators believed there was widespread
cheating, were tightened under a 2004 tax law. Now,
if a charity sells — rather than uses — a donated
car, the donor can write off only the amount the charity
received for the car.)
Other changes in the recently enacted law:
• One provision makes it easier for wealthy
seniors to donate money from their retirement plans
by allowing gifts of as much as $100,000 to be directly
distributed to the charity, instead of distributed
to the donor, who would then give the proceeds.
How does that help? Before, such a distribution boosted
the taxpayer's taxable income, possibly causing a shift into a higher tax bracket
and making otherwise untaxed Social Security benefits
subject to tax.
The change makes it more likely that wealthy seniors
will give gifts while they're living, rather than
donate them from their estates, said Marcus Lingenfelter, vice president for advancement at Harrisburg
University of Science and Technology.
• Wealthy hunters,
who had written off the cost of exotic hunts by giving
their kill — stuffed and mounted — to nonprofit organizations,
will face new restrictions on what they can deduct.
Under the new rules, only the cost of the taxidermy
would be deductible — not the cost of the trip, gun
or bullets. And if the charity doesn't use the gift
in the course of its operations, the deduction could
be disallowed.
• Taxpayers who gave
property to conservation groups also will be restricted.
Two years ago, IRS Commissioner Mark Everson told
Congress that gifts of "conservation easements"
were rife with abuse, with taxpayers overvaluing the
gifts and charities doing little to monitor the property.
New rules ensure that donors don't maintain control
over property that has been deducted as a charitable
gift.
Kathy M. Kristof welcomes your comments. Write to Personal Finance,
Business Section, Los Angeles Times, 202 W. 1st St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, or e-mail kathy.kristof@latimes.com. For previous columns,
visit latimes.com/kristof.